Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Molecular Cancer and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research

Genetic variants of p27 and p21 as predictors for risk of second primary malignancy in patients with index squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck

Zhongqiu Wang12, Erich M Sturgis13, Fenghua Zhang14, Dapeng Lei156, Zhensheng Liu3, Li Xu1, Xicheng Song17, Qingyi Wei3 and Guojun Li13*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA

2 Department of Radiology, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200120, China

3 Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA

4 Department of General Surgery, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, China

5 Department of Otolaryngology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan Shandong 250012, China

6 Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology, Ministry of Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China

7 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China

For all author emails, please log on.

Molecular Cancer 2012, 11:17  doi:10.1186/1476-4598-11-17

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/11/1/17


Received:11 January 2012
Accepted:26 March 2012
Published:26 March 2012

© 2012 Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Cell cycle deregulation is common in human cancer, and alterations of p27 and p21, two critical cell cycle regulators, have been implicated in the development of many human malignancies. Therefore, we hypothesize that p27 T109G polymorphism individually or in combination with p21 (C98A and C70T) polymorphisms modifies risk of second primary malignancy (SPM) in patients with index squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN).

Methods

A cohort of 1,292 patients with index SCCHN was recruited between May 1995 and January 2007 at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and followed for SPM occurrence. Patients were genotyped for the three polymorphisms. A log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare SPM-free survival and SPM risk.

Results

We found that patients with p27 109 TG/GG, p21 98 CA/AA and p21 70 CT/TT variant genotypes had a worse SPM-free survival and an increased SPM risk than those with the corresponding p27109 TT, p21 98 CC, and p21 70 CC common genotypes, respectively. After combining the three polymorphisms, there was a trend for significantly increased SPM risk with increasing number of the variant genotypes (Ptrend = 0.0002). Moreover, patients with the variant genotypes had an approximately 2.4-fold significantly increased risk for SPM compared with those with no variant genotypes (HR, 2.4, 95% CI, 1.6-3.6).

Conclusions

These results suggest that p27 T109G polymorphism individually or in combination with p21 (C98A and C70T) polymorphisms increases risk of SPM in patients with index SCCHN.

Keywords:
p21; p27; Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck; Second primary malignancy; Genetic susceptibility; Polymorphism

Introduction

In the United States, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) accounts for approximately 50,000 new cancer cases, causing 11,480 deaths annually [1,2]. SCCHN has modest survival rates mainly because of second primary malignancies (SPM), comorbid illnesses, and index cancer recurrence [3]. A leading cause of mortality in such patients is the development of SPM [3]. Additional studies on host factors that predict SPM in SCCHN patients are needed so that intensive surveillance or targeted intervention for patients at high-risk of SPM may improve prognosis. In addition to smoking, alcohol drinking and cancer treatment as risk factors for SPM, genetic predisposition might also influence the development of SPM after index SCCHN [3-10].

A common feature of human cancer is cell cycle deregulation, and cell cycle progression is governed by the activation cyclin and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), which function together in the G1 phase to initiate S phase and in G2 to initiate mitosis. Through regulation of cyclin-CDK complexes, p27 and p21, two critical CDK inhibitors, act as a fail-safe mechanism involved in DNA repair and apoptosis [11]. Furthermore, p21 can inhibit CDK activity not only individually but also in combination with p27 to increase cellular levels of this inhibition [12]. Therefore, both p27 and p21 may serve as universal CDK inhibitors and play active roles in the development of SPM, because these two proteins have similar biological activities in the regulation of cell cycle control, DNA repair, and apoptosis.

Several molecular epidemiological studies have examined associations of common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in p21and p27 with risk of various cancers, including SCCHN [13-17]. These SNPs include p21 C98A (a non-synonymous serine-to-arginine substitution at codon 31), p21 C70T (a single C-to-T substitution 20 nt downstream of the stop codon at exon 3), and p27 T109G (a T-to-G change at codon 109 resulting in an amino acid substitution of valine for glycine). The two polymorphisms of p21 have been previously reported to significantly modify risk of SPM after index SCCHN [18], but no such studies have been done for the p27 polymorphism. Moreover, because both p21 and p27 are involved in the same cell cycle regulation pathway and bind to cyclin D1-CDK complexes to inhibit their catalytic activity and induce cell-cycle arrest, they may have redundant or synergistic effect on cell cycle inhibition. However, there is no published study that has assessed, simultaneously, above three putatively functional SNPs in SPM. Thus, given the crucial roles of both p27 and p21 in cell cycle regulation, we hypothesize that p27 (T109G) polymorphism individually or in combination with p21 (C98A and C70T) polymorphisms modifies risk for SPM after index SCCHN, and we tested this hypothesis in a cohort of 1,292 SCCHN patients.

Results

This was a relatively large and well-characterized cohort of 1,292 SCCHN patients who were followed up for a median follow-up time of 34 months (range 0 to 142.4 months), and the overall median follow-up time was 30.9 and 14.4 months for SPM-free patients and SPM patients, respectively. Table 1 shows demographics, tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking, and clinical variables for the patients. Of the 120 SPM patients, 81 developed SPMs at tobacco-related sites including 44 SCCHN SPM and 37 other tobacco-related cancers (34 lung cancer, 2 esophagus cancer, and 1 bladder cancer), 35 developed SPMs at non-tobacco-related SPMs (10 prostate cancer, 8 papillary thyroid carcinoma, 4 colon adenocarcinoma, 3 lymphoma, 3 hepatic adenocarcinoma, 2 breast cancer, and 1 each for the remainder including sarcoma, renal cell carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, leukemia, and maxillary sinus adenocarcinoma); and 4 developed SPMs at both tobacco-related and non-tobacco-related sites ((2 patients with both SCCHN and prostate cancer and 2 patients with both SCCHN and papillary thyroid carcinoma).

Table 1. Distribution of selected characteristics of the patient cohort (n = 1,292)

In this cohort of SCCHN patients, the mean age at diagnosis for the index SCCHN was 57.4 years (range, 18-94 years, median, 57 years), and the mean age of index SCCHN patients who developed SPM was significantly older than that of patients who were SPM-free (60.8 years versus 57.1 years, respectively; P < 0.01). The male patients (76.0%) were the majority of study subjects in this study (76.0%), but we did not find that sex was associated with SPM development (P = 0.518). In addition, no significant differences in characteristics regarding smoking (P = 0.122), alcohol drinking (P = 0.348), cancer site (P = 0.320), cancer stage (P = 0.720), or treatment (P = 0.894) were found between patients who developed SPM and those who were SPM-free. However, ethnicity was significantly different between patients who were SPM-free and patients who developed SPM, and the patients who were non-Hispanic whites more likely developed a SPM than the patients who were not non-Hispanic whites (P = 0.050).

The distributions of p27 T109G, p21 C98A, and p21 C70T genotypes between patients who developed SPM and those who did not and their associations with risk of SPM are presented in Table 2. p27 109 TG + GG variant genotypes were common in patients who developed SPM (62.5%) as opposed to patients who were SPM-free (43.6%), and these p27 109 G variant genotypes were associated with a 2-fold significantly increased risk of SPM compared with the p27 109 TT common homozygous genotype (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5-3.1). As we have previously reported, the variant genotypes of the two p21 polymorphisms were significantly associated with increased risk of SPM compared to their corresponding common homozygous genotypes after multivariable adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, smoking, and drinking [18]. When we performed similar analyses stratified by SPM type, the effect modification of the three polymorphisms was not pronounced for tobacco-related SPMs, compared to non-tobacco-related SPMs (data not shown). Furthermore, no significant difference in SPM risk was observed, when SPMs were stratified by smoking status at the time of diagnosis of index SCCHN (ever versus never smokers) (data not shown). We also did not observe pronounced effects of each polymorphism of p21 and p27 on risk of SPMs at either tobacco-associated sites or non-tobacco-associated sites (data not shown).

Table 2. SPM risk associated with p27/p21 polymorphisms after index SCCHN

Since each of three SNPs in p27 and p21 genes in cell cycle regulation had a moderate effect on risk of SPM, we then assessed the combined effect of all three SNPs on risk of SPM in patients with index SCCHN as shown in Table 3. In order to evaluate the joint effect of these p27 and p21 polymorphisms on risk of SPM, we categorized all patients into four groups based on the number of variant genotypes they carried. We also dichotomized patients into two groups: 1) a 'no variant' reference group and 2) a 'variant' group. We found that patients who developed SPM were more likely to carry the combined variant genotypes than those who remained SPM-free (P < 0.001). Patients with variant genotypes of three polymorphisms in p27 and p21 experienced a significantly reduced SPM-free survival compared with those who had no variant genotypes (log-rank, P < 0.001, Figure 1). We also found that the SPM risk increased with the number of variant genotypes, and the trend in risk was statistically significant in a dose-response manner (P = 0.0002 for trend). Specifically, patients carrying 3 variant genotypes were approximately 3 times more likely to develop a SPM than those carrying no variant genotypes (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.6-5.7). Those patients who possessed either variant allele (p27 109 G, p21 98 A or p21 70 T) were almost a 2.5 times more likely to develop a SPM (HR, 2.4, 95% CI, 1.6-3.6) than those who had the combined p27 109 TT, p21 98 CC, and p21 70 CC common genotypes.

Table 3. SPM risk associated with p27/p21 polymorphisms after index SCCHN

thumbnailFigure 1. Kaplan-Meier SPM-free survival curve stratified by combined p21/p27 genotypes.

Discussion and conclusion

p21 and p27 are both G1-checkpoint CDK inhibitors and have an approximately 42% amino acid homology at the amino-terminal domain, which mediates inhibition of CDK and interacts with various CDK complexes [19]. Alterations of expression or function of these two critical regulators in the cell cycle control has been implicated in the etiologies and disease prognosis of human malignancies [20]. In this study, we found that each of three SNPs of p27 and p21 genes was associated with a significantly increased risk of SPM in patients with index SCCHN. We also observed significant associations of the combined variant genotypes of three polymorphisms with increased risk of SPM in patients with index SCCHN, and the trend in risk was statistically significant in a dose-response manner. In addition, the patients with either variant allele of three SNPs were more likely to develop a SPM than the patients with no variant genotypes. Approximately 15% of SCCHN patients develop a SPM, a significant cause of posttreatment morbidity and mortality for the diseases. Although the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, for SCCHN patients have been improved, the poor prognosis for SCCHN patients has not significantly improved, partly because of the high frequency of SPM. Therefore, p27 and p21 polymorphisms may serve as a marker for genetic susceptibility to SPMs after index SCCHN, and for identifying high-risk subgroups of SCCHN patients who might benefit from management of alternative treatment and predictable patient outcome for an improved survival and a better quality of life. Moreover, identifying markers of risk for SPM among cancer survivors would greatly enhance secondary prevention, which is currently limited to rather simplistic clinical post-treatment screenings.

The roles of both p27 and p21 proteins in modulating cell cycle regulation has been well established. For example, overexpression of p27 was reported to inhibit CDK activation and entry into the S phase of the cell cycle [21]. As p27 may be involved in pathways regulated by both mitogenic and antiproliferative extrinsic signals, the expression level of p27 was found to be positively correlated with cell differentiation, and loss of its function may subsequently contribute to tumorigenesis [22,23]. p27 is rarely mutated in human malignancies; however, reduced expression of p27 was found to be frequent in various types of cancers, such as gastric, breast, prostate, and non-small cell lung cancers [24,25]. Furthermore, the reduced expression of p27 was also found to be correlated with poor clinical prognosis in head and neck cancers [26,27]. On the other hand, p21 protein is a downstream target of p53. In response to DNA damage, increased expression of p21 following p53 activation leads to either cell-cycle arrest at the G1 checkpoint or apoptosis. Through inhibition of proliferating cell nuclear antigen-dependent DNA replication and mismatch repair in vitro, p21 expression can suppress tumor growth [28]. Additionally, the overexpression of p21 may prevent mammalian cell proliferation and inhibit all cyclin-CDK complexes, suggesting that p21 is a universal inhibitor of cyclin-CDK complexes [29]. Moreover, overexpression of p21 and the subsequent overall reduced CDK activity was found to be associated with cell differentiation [30]. While somatic mutations in p21 gene are rare in human malignancies [31], reduced tumor expression of p21 has been associated with poor clinical prognosis [32]. Because both p27 and p21 play important roles in cell cycle control regulation, it is suggested that alterations of p27 and p21 genes, such as above mentioned genetic polymorphisms, may, at least in part, reflect increased susceptibility of SCCHN patients to SPM. Recent studies have indicated that SNPs of genes in cell cycle control play an important role in carcinogenesis and may lead to altered susceptibility to different cancers, including primary SCCHN and their SPM [13,15,17,18,33-35]. Therefore, individuals carrying polymorphic CDK inhibitors that may affect its protein function are likely to be more susceptible to cancer.

Among p27 and p21 polymorphisms, the p27 T109G polymorphism is within a region (amino acids 97-151) physically interacting with the Jun activation domain-binding protein 1, which triggers proteolytic degradation of p27 [36]. Therefore, it is speculated that this polymorphism may affect p27 degradation. So far, the p27 T109G polymorphism has been reported to be associated with risk and prognosis of prostate carcinoma and breast cancer [14-16], whereas the results were not consistent. These inconsistent results may be due to differences between studies of cancer types, patient population, and different risk factors for various types of cancers. Other factors in the studies such as small sample size, inclusion of different ethnic groups in a single study, gene-gene or gene-environment interactions, or inadequate adjustment for confounding factors could also cause the inconsistent results. The functional relevance of this p27 polymorphism needs further investigations as p27KIP1 exerts anti- and pro-tumorigenic activities [37]. Likewise, both p21 C98A and C70T polymorphisms are thought to cause p21 functional change, because p21 C98A (at codon 31 in exon 2) may affect the DNA-binding zinc finger motif [38], while p21 C70T (within the 3' untranslated region in exon 3) lies in a crucial region for cell differentiation, proliferation and tumor suppression [39,40]. Moreover, several previous studies have reported that these p21 polymorphisms may affect protein expression and activity and may have an effect on carcinogenesis [13,18,31]. However, the exact mechanisms for these observations remain unknown, and therefore, future studies on biological functions of these polymorphisms are needed.

Although the current study had a relatively larger cohort of SCCHN patients, there were few inherent limitations as previously described [9,10,18]. Briefly, our data on demographics, exposure, and clinical variables for the cohort were collected prospectively, but SPM outcome was recorded retrospectively. Because this cohort included multiple ethnicities, our results might not be generalizable to other ethnic populations. Additionally, because the time for SPM follow-up was limited due to the majority of patients with stage III and IV index cancer, these patients may have less opportunity to develop a SPM, and patients with late stage disease may be lost to follow-up or die relatively soon after recruitment or diagnosis. Furthermore, a screening bias for detecting tobacco-associated SPM or non-tobacco associated SPM might also exist. Finally, lack of tumor human papillomavirus (HPV) data and relatively low SPM rate might bias our estimates of association. Presently, we have not collected enough HPV data in our analysis for adjustment, and the low SPM rate might be due to a high proportion of never-smoker patients and use of strict criteria for SPM detection in this study. All of these confounding factors will be considered in our future studies.

In conclusion, our data suggest that p27 and p21 polymorphisms appear to alter individual susceptibility to SPM in patients with index SCCHN and that the p27 (T109G) polymorphism may individually or in combination with p21 (C98A and C70T) polymorphisms to increase risk of SPM in patients with an index SCCHN. However, future larger and well designed studies with longer follow-up time are needed to verify our findings.

Materials and methods

Study patients

In this study, patients with index SCCHN were recruited through the Head and Neck Center at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between May 1995 and January 2007. Patients with SCCHN were typically followed and monitored through their treatment and post-treatment courses with regularly scheduled clinical and radiographic examinations. Details for recruitment of study patients have been previously described [9]. A SPM was carefully defined according to the modified criteria of Warren and Gates [41]. Briefly, SPMs were considered, if the second lesions had different histopathologic types, or if they developed over 5 years after treatment for the index tumor, and/or clearly separated by normal epithelium according to clinical and radiographic assessment. Pulmonary lesions were included as a SPM, if they had a non-squamous histology or if they were isolated squamous lesions over 5 years from index SCCHN and considered by both thoracic oncologist and thoracic surgeonas a SPM. If there was discrepancy or difference in opinions regarding recurrence or SPM, the second lesion was not considered a SPM but local recurrence. This study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.

p27 and p21 genotyping

We used genomic DNA extracted from the buffy-coat fraction of the blood samples to genotype p27 and p21 polymorphisms as previously described [13,17]. We performed the PCR analysis with a PTC-200 DNA Engine Peltier thermal cycler (MJ Research, Waltham, MA) in 10 μl of PCR mixture. The PCR mixture contained approximately 20 ng of genomic DNA, 0.1 mM dNTPs, 1× PCR buffer (50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris HCl, and 0.1% Triton X-100), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 units of Taq polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and 2 pmol of each primer. Specifically, for p27 V109G genotype, the amplification conditions were 5 min of initial denaturation at 95°C followed by 35 cycles of 15 sec at 94°C, 30 sec at 60°C, and 1 min at 72°C and a final 5-min step at 72°C for final extension. A 454-base pair (bp) PCR products were digested with restriction enzyme Bgl I at 37°C overnight (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), and separated with 3% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide. The genotype of codon 109 was determined by a Gly allele with a fragment length of 76, 116, and 262 bp and a Val allele with fragments lengths of 76 and 378 bp. For p21 C98A and p21C70T genotypes, the amplification conditions were 5 min of initial denaturation at 95°C; 35 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 35 s at 55°C, and 45 s at 72°C; and a final 5-min extension step at 72°C. The conditions were the same for both genotypes except that 30 cycles of 30 s at 59°C (annealing) and 30 sec at 72°C (extension) were used for p21C70T. PCR products [496 base pairs (bp) for p21 C98A and 298 bp for p21C70T] were digested with the restriction enzymes BsmAI (for p21 C98A) or PstI (for p21C70T) (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) overnight at 55°C (for BsmAI) or 37°C (for PstI) and separated with 3% Metaphor gel containing ethidium bromide. The genotype of p21 C98A was identified by an A allele with fragment lengths of 77, 92, and 238 bp and a C allele with fragment lengths of 92, 165, and 238 bp. The genotype of p21C70T was identified by a T allele with a fragment length of 298 bp and a C allele with fragment lengths of 173 and 125 bp.

We evaluated the genotyping results without knowing the subjects with SPM or without SPM. For quality control purpose, we repeated at least 10% of random samples with a 100% concordance.

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance was determined by P values (P < 0.05) and all tests were two-sided. The Chi-squared tests were used to exam differences in distribution of demographic, clinical, and genotyping variables between patients who had SPM and those who did not. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to determine SPM-free survival between different risk groups. Both univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for SPM assessment, and details in building the multivariable Cox models were described previously [9]. The final Cox models were fully adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and smoking and alcohol status after a stepwise search strategy in developing the multivariable Cox models. Software utilized for analysis was Statistical Analysis System software (SAS version 9.1.3; SAS Institute).

Abbreviations

SCCHN: Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; SPM: Second primary malignancies; HR: Hazard ratio; CI: Confidence interval; HPV: Human papillomavirus; CDKs: Cyclin-dependent kinases; SNPs: Single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

ZW participated in the design of the study, data analysis, and manuscript writing. EMS participated in study design, statistical analysis and manuscript writing. FZ performed literature review and drafted the manuscript. DL participated in study design and helped to draft the manuscript. ZL carried out the laboratory analysis. LX participated in statistical analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. QW participated in study design, data analysis, and manuscript writing. GL participated in study design, data analysis and manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Ms. Margaret Lung, Ms. Angeli Fairley, Ms. Liliana Mugartegui, and Ms. Kathryn Tipton with assistance with patient recruitment.

Supported by: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Grant R01 ES-11740 (to Q.W.); N.I.H. Grant P-30 CA-16672 (to The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center); and N.I.H. grant CA135679 (to G.L.) and CA133099 (to G.L.)

References

  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P: Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000.

    Int J Cancer 2001, 94:153-156. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010.

    CA Cancer J Clin 2010, 60:277-300. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Rose BS, Jeong JH, Nath SK, Lu SM, Mell LK: Population-based study of competing mortality in head and neck cancer.

    J Clin Oncol 2011, 29:3503-3509. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Day GL, Blot WJ, Shore RE, McLaughlin JK, Austin DF, Greenberg RS, Liff JM, Preston-Martin S, Sarkar S, Schoenberg JB, et al.: Second cancers following oral and pharyngeal cancers: role of tobacco and alcohol.

    J Natl Cancer Inst 1994, 86:131-137. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Do KA, Johnson MM, Lee JJ, Wu XF, Dong Q, Hong WK, Khuri FR, Spitz MR: Longitudinal study of smoking patterns in relation to the development of smoking-related secondary primary tumors in patients with upper aerodigestive tract malignancies.

    Cancer 2004, 101:2837-2842. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Ng AK, Travis LB: Second primary cancers: an overview.

    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2008, 22:271-289.

    vii

    PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Gal TJ, Huang WY, Chen C, Hayes RB, Schwartz SM: DNA repair gene polymorphisms and risk of second primary neoplasms and mortality in oral cancer patients.

    Laryngoscope 2005, 115:2221-2231. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Minard CG, Spitz MR, Wu X, Hong WK, Etzel CJ: Evaluation of glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and mutagen sensitivity as risk factors for the development of second primary tumors in patients previously diagnosed with early-stage head and neck cancer.

    Cancer 2006, 106:2636-2644. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Li F, Sturgis EM, Zafereo ME, Liu Z, Wang LE, Wei Q, Li G: p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism and risk of second primary malignancy after index squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck.

    Int J Cancer 2009, 125:2660-2665. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  10. Zafereo ME, Sturgis EM, Liu Z, Wang LE, Wei Q, Li G: Nucleotide excision repair core gene polymorphisms and risk of second primary malignancy in patients with index squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

    Carcinogenesis 2009, 30:997-1002. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  11. Sherr CJ, Roberts JM: CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression.

    Genes Dev 1999, 13:1501-1512. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. He G, Kuang J, Huang Z, Koomen J, Kobayashi R, Khokhar AR, Siddik ZH: Upregulation of p27 and its inhibition of CDK2/cyclin E activity following DNA damage by a novel platinum agent are dependent on the expression of p21.

    Br J Cancer 2006, 95:1514-1524. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  13. Li G, Liu Z, Sturgis EM, Shi Q, Chamberlain RM, Spitz MR, Wei Q: Genetic polymorphisms of p21 are associated with risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

    Carcinogenesis 2005, 26:1596-1602. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Figueiredo JC, Knight JA, Cho S, Savas S, Onay UV, Briollais L, Goodwin PJ, McLaughlin JR, Andrulis IL, Ozcelik H: Polymorphisms cMyc-N11S and p27-V109G and breast cancer risk and prognosis.

    BMC Cancer 2007, 7:99. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  15. Kibel AS, Suarez BK, Belani J, Oh J, Webster R, Brophy-Ebbers M, Guo C, Catalona WJ, Picus J, Goodfellow PJ: CDKN1A and CDKN1B polymorphisms and risk of advanced prostate carcinoma.

    Cancer Res 2003, 63:2033-2036. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Schondorf T, Eisele L, Gohring UJ, Valter MM, Warm M, Mallmann P, Becker M, Fechteler R, Weisshaar MP, Hoopmann M: The V109G polymorphism of the p27 gene CDKN1B indicates a worse outcome in node-negative breast cancer patients.

    Tumour Biol 2004, 25:306-312. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Li G, Sturgis EM, Wang LE, Chamberlain RM, Spitz MR, El-Naggar AK, Hong WK, Wei Q: Association between the V109G polymorphism of the p27 gene and the risk and progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

    Clin Cancer Res 2004, 10:3996-4002. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Lei D, Sturgis EM, Liu Z, Zafereo ME, Wei Q, Li G: Genetic polymorphisms of p21 and risk of second primary malignancy in patients with index squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

    Carcinogenesis 2010, 31:222-227. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  19. Lloyd RV, Erickson LA, Jin L, Kulig E, Qian X, Cheville JC, Scheithauer BW: p27kip1: a multifunctional cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor with prognostic significance in human cancers.

    Am J Pathol 1999, 154:313-323. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  20. Abukhdeir AM, Park BH: P21 and p27: roles in carcinogenesis and drug resistance.

    Expert Rev Mol Med 2008, 10:e19. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  21. Polyak K, Kato JY, Solomon MJ, Sherr CJ, Massague J, Roberts JM, Koff A: p27Kip1, a cyclin-Cdk inhibitor, links transforming growth factor-beta and contact inhibition to cell cycle arrest.

    Genes Dev 1994, 8:9-22. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Choi HR, Tucker SA, Huang Z, Gillenwater AM, Luna MA, Batsakis JG, El-Naggar AK: Differential expressions of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (p27 and p21) and their relation to p53 and Ki-67 in oral squamous tumorigenesis.

    Int J Oncol 2003, 22:409-414. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  23. Koufos A, Grundy P, Morgan K, Aleck KA, Hadro T, Lampkin BC, Kalbakji A, Cavenee WK: Familial Wiedemann-Beckwith syndrome and a second Wilms tumor locus both map to 11p15.5.

    Am J Hum Genet 1989, 44:711-719. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  24. Kuropkat C, Rudolph P, Frahm SO, Parwaresch R, Werner JA: Proliferation marker Ki-S11-a prognostic indicator for squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx.

    Virchows Arch 1999, 435:590-595. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  25. Kawamata N, Morosetti R, Miller CW, Park D, Spirin KS, Nakamaki T, Takeuchi S, Hatta Y, Simpson J, Wilcyznski S, et al.: Molecular analysis of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor gene p27/Kip1 in human malignancies.

    Cancer Res 1995, 55:2266-2269. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  26. Mineta H, Miura K, Suzuki I, Takebayashi S, Amano H, Araki K, Harada H, Ichimura K, Wennerberg JP, Dictor MR: Low p27 expression correlates with poor prognosis for patients with oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

    Cancer 1999, 85:1011-1017. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  27. Kudo Y, Takata T, Ogawa I, Zhao M, Sato S, Takekoshi T, Miyauchi M, Nikai H: Reduced expression of p27(Kip1) correlates with an early stage of cancer invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

    Cancer Lett 2000, 151:217-222. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  28. Waga S, Hannon GJ, Beach D, Stillman B: The p21 inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases controls DNA replication by interaction with PCNA.

    Nature 1994, 369:574-578. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  29. Xiong Y, Hannon GJ, Zhang H, Casso D, Kobayashi R, Beach D: p21 is a universal inhibitor of cyclin kinases.

    Nature 1993, 366:701-704. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  30. Moffatt KA, Johannes WU, Hedlund TE, Miller GJ: Growth inhibitory effects of 1alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) are mediated by increased levels of p21 in the prostatic carcinoma cell line ALVA-31.

    Cancer Res 2001, 61:7122-7129. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  31. Roninson IB: Oncogenic functions of tumour suppressor p21(Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1): association with cell senescence and tumour-promoting activities of stromal fibroblasts.

    Cancer Lett 2002, 179:1-14. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  32. Pruneri G, Pignataro L, Carboni N, Buffa R, Di Finizio D, Cesana BM, Neri A: Clinical relevance of expression of the CIP/KIP cell-cycle inhibitors p21 and p27 in laryngeal cancer.

    J Clin Oncol 1999, 17:3150-3159. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  33. Asomaning K, Reid AE, Zhou W, Heist RS, Zhai R, Su L, Kwak EL, Blaszkowsky L, Zhu AX, Ryan DP, et al.: MDM2 promoter polymorphism and pancreatic cancer risk and prognosis.

    Clin Cancer Res 2008, 14:4010-4015. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  34. Gayther SA, Song H, Ramus SJ, Kjaer SK, Whittemore AS, Quaye L, Tyrer J, Shadforth D, Hogdall E, Hogdall C, et al.: Tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms in cell cycle control genes and susceptibility to invasive epithelial ovarian cancer.

    Cancer Res 2007, 67:3027-3035. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  35. Kong S, Wei Q, Amos CI, Lynch PM, Levin B, Zong J, Frazier ML: Cyclin D1 polymorphism and increased risk of colorectal cancer at young age.

    J Natl Cancer Inst 2001, 93:1106-1108. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  36. Tomoda K, Kubota Y, Kato J: Degradation of the cyclin-dependent-kinase inhibitor p27Kip1 is instigated by Jab1.

    Nature 1999, 398:160-165. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  37. Lee J, Kim SS: The function of p27KIP1 during tumor development.

    Exp Mol Med 2009, 41:765-771. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  38. Chedid M, Michieli P, Lengel C, Huppi K, Givol D: A single nucleotide substitution at codon 31 (Ser/Arg) defines a polymorphism in a highly conserved region of the p53-inducible gene WAF1/CIP1.

    Oncogene 1994, 9:3021-3024. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  39. Rastinejad F, Blau HM: Genetic complementation reveals a novel regulatory role for 3' untranslated regions in growth and differentiation.

    Cell 1993, 72:903-917. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  40. Rastinejad F, Conboy MJ, Rando TA, Blau HM: Tumor suppression by RNA from the 3' untranslated region of alpha-tropomyosin.

    Cell 1993, 75:1107-1117. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  41. Warren S, Gates O: Multiple primary malignant tumors: a survey of the literature and statistical study.

    Am J Cancer 1932, 51:1358. OpenURL